Detection of fakes
The Museum of the Bible in Washington in October 2017 acquired 16 fragments of the Dead Sea scrolls, made an examination at the "Federal Institute for the Study and Testing of Materials" and all of them were found to be fakes.
The rest of the scrolls are believed to be authentic, although no one has ever been allowed to examine them.
This is understandable, on the basis of these scrolls it "turned out" that the Masoretic text is the most accurate, although the Masoretes destroyed texts that were erroneous from their point of view, obviously promoting their version.
On this basis, of great interest is the translation of the Septuagint, which used texts dating back hundreds of years BC, which are not available today.
One of the fragments found
Qumran caves in which scrolls were found
The clay vessel, one of those in which scrolls were stored
In early 1947, two young shepherds from the Taamir tribe grazed goats in a desert area called Wadi Qumran (West Bank of the Jordan), on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea, 20 km east of Jerusalem. Their ATTENTION attracted a hole in the rock. Penetrating through it into the cave, they, and to their surprise, found there eight large earthen vessels. In one of them there were several scrolls, sewn from pieces of parchment and wrapped in pieces of linen cloth. Parchment was written in parallel columns of the text in a language other than Arabic.
For many weeks the young men found a find before they reached Bethlehem, where they offered scrolls to a Syrian merchant who sent them to the Syrian Metropolitan Jeshua Samuel Athanasius at the monastery of St. Mark in Jerusalem. Metropolitan realized that these are Hebrew manuscripts, and bought 4 of them and a number of fragments, leaving the rest at the merchant. But everyone to whom the rector showed his acquisitions, unanimously argued that manuscripts can not be ancient.
This prejudice was explained by the fact that, with the exception of the so-called. Papyrus Nash, containing only the Shema prayers and the Ten Commandments in Hebrew and dated from the 2nd century. BC. On 1 in. AD, the biblical texts in the Hebrew language were known only by comparatively late manuscripts, not earlier than the 9th century.
Only at the end of 1947 Professor E. Sukenik, an archaeologist at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, managed to acquire the 3 remaining manuscripts from a merchant from Bethlehem. The first to realize their ancient origin and significance, Sukenik dated manuscripts of the 2-1 centuries. BC. A subsequent radio carbon study of the linen fabric into which the scrolls were wrapped, generally confirmed this dating, pointing to a period between 167 BC. And 237 AD
In 1948, the Metropolitan sent several scrolls to the American School of Oriental Studies in Jerusalem, where they also recognized their significance.
In early 1949, the Metropolitan left the war-torn Jerusalem and sailed to the United States, taking with him the scrolls of the book of Isaiah, the Charter of the community, comments on Habakkuk (Habakkuk), the apocalypse of Lamech and large fragments of the book of Daniel.
In 1954, they acquired the University of Jerusalem through intermediaries. Documents that originally fell into the hands of Sukenik include a fragment of the book of Isaiah, the scroll of the War of the Sons of Light against the sons of darkness and Thanksgiving hymns.
It is difficult to overestimate this finding. There were manuscripts of all the books of the Old Testament (Tanach), except for the book of Ruth. These findings confirmed the accuracy of the biblical text. In addition, there were found and simply historical records. This helped to confirm the authenticity of the Bible.
Importance of the find
The Massorets, while creating a single standard of Scripture, destroyed the source code, which became the reason for distrust in the integrity of the work.
The text of the entire Bible was found in the scrolls.
Septuagint - Until then we had copies of the Septuagint written only by the Church. As soon as the church began to actively use the Septuagint text, the Jews abandoned it. This means that a suspicion arose that the Church could adjust the text to suit its teaching.
Many fragments of the Septuagint from the pre-Christian period were found at Qumran, which proved the correctness of previous copies of the Septuagint.
