Internet review - Lite Web-master Graphics Games Freeware Time Christmas Bible
Christian Internet Media Bible Teachings Ministry Church Israel
Audio Bible Bible for Children Bible For kids Strong numbers Parallel translations Reading plans Christian

Scrolls of the Dead Sea

Detection of fakes

The Museum of the Bible in Washington in October 2017 acquired 16 fragments of the Dead Sea scrolls, made an examination at the "Federal Institute for the Study and Testing of Materials" and all of them were found to be fakes.

The rest of the scrolls are believed to be authentic, although no one has ever been allowed to examine them.
This is understandable, on the basis of these scrolls it "turned out" that the Masoretic text is the most accurate, although the Masoretes destroyed texts that were erroneous from their point of view, obviously promoting their version.

On this basis, of great interest is the translation of the Septuagint, which used texts dating back hundreds of years BC, which are not available today.

Qumran
One of the fragments found


Qumran
Qumran caves in which scrolls were found


Qumran
The clay vessel, one of those in which scrolls were stored


In early 1947, two young shepherds from the Taamir tribe grazed goats in a desert area called Wadi Qumran (West Bank of the Jordan), on the northwest shore of the Dead Sea, 20 km east of Jerusalem. Their ATTENTION attracted a hole in the rock. Penetrating through it into the cave, they, and to their surprise, found there eight large earthen vessels. In one of them there were several scrolls, sewn from pieces of parchment and wrapped in pieces of linen cloth. Parchment was written in parallel columns of the text in a language other than Arabic.

For many weeks the young men found a find before they reached Bethlehem, where they offered scrolls to a Syrian merchant who sent them to the Syrian Metropolitan Jeshua Samuel Athanasius at the monastery of St. Mark in Jerusalem. Metropolitan realized that these are Hebrew manuscripts, and bought 4 of them and a number of fragments, leaving the rest at the merchant. But everyone to whom the rector showed his acquisitions, unanimously argued that manuscripts can not be ancient.

This prejudice was explained by the fact that, with the exception of the so-called. Papyrus Nash, containing only the Shema prayers and the Ten Commandments in Hebrew and dated from the 2nd century. BC. On 1 in. AD, the biblical texts in the Hebrew language were known only by comparatively late manuscripts, not earlier than the 9th century.

Only at the end of 1947 Professor E. Sukenik, an archaeologist at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, managed to acquire the 3 remaining manuscripts from a merchant from Bethlehem. The first to realize their ancient origin and significance, Sukenik dated manuscripts of the 2-1 centuries. BC. A subsequent radio carbon study of the linen fabric into which the scrolls were wrapped, generally confirmed this dating, pointing to a period between 167 BC. And 237 AD

In 1948, the Metropolitan sent several scrolls to the American School of Oriental Studies in Jerusalem, where they also recognized their significance.

In early 1949, the Metropolitan left the war-torn Jerusalem and sailed to the United States, taking with him the scrolls of the book of Isaiah, the Charter of the community, comments on Habakkuk (Habakkuk), the apocalypse of Lamech and large fragments of the book of Daniel.

In 1954, they acquired the University of Jerusalem through intermediaries. Documents that originally fell into the hands of Sukenik include a fragment of the book of Isaiah, the scroll of the War of the Sons of Light against the sons of darkness and Thanksgiving hymns.

It is difficult to overestimate this finding. There were manuscripts of all the books of the Old Testament (Tanach), except for the book of Ruth. These findings confirmed the accuracy of the biblical text. In addition, there were found and simply historical records. This helped to confirm the authenticity of the Bible.

Print Friendly and PDF





Bible, glossary Bible Study Did the Jews copy history from the Sumerians?

Bible History
Bible development Russian Bible History Dividing Bible into verses Bible formats Bible authors
Bible statistics
Bible statistics Bible and Mathematics
Canon
Canon Old Testament Canon New Testament Canon Gospel harmony Old Testament Apocrypha New Testament Apocrypha
Bible division
Tanah Septuagint Vulgata Comparison table Canons - Jewish, Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant



Mobile version

Terms of publication of the article
Advertising
About us
Graphics

Fonts
Logos
Brandbooks
Pictogramms
Heraldry

Popular

Check a website level
A website registration
How to creat a website
#1 on Google
Online Translators
Password

Internet top

©2005-2024, Web studio Ph4 - Internet Catalog for user, web-master and designer v. 6.0.3